It was based on work one of my tutors did as part of her PhD research where she conducted interviews with hundreds of English teachers and boiled them down into broad 'types'. In groups, we each had to look at the description of a 'type' and translate what was quite a dense text into simplified language and report back to the rest of the class.
We had the 'Reluctant Conformist', the 'Traditionalist', the 'Politically active, free-thinker' and our type, which I will name the 'Individualist'. The Individualist promotes 'child-centered' learning, exploring issues from the pupil's point of view and valuing an individual's cultural and linguistic identity above all. Parts of this type resonated with me, but so did parts of the others. In some areas I am a traditionalist, believing in the value of exams, for instance. Something that seems to vex a lot of people on the course is the idea of 'setting' children (as opposed to having children of all abilities in one class). Like the Individualist, this does not excite me at all.
As I progress in my training I know my personal philosophy will develop, and it will probably be a patchwork quilt of a philosophy - a little bit of this, a little bit of that. Because I don't think I want to conform neatly to a type. Or maybe I will start out as one type, Miss Idealistically Optimistic perhaps, and turn into something quite different when the reality of the classroom hits me. I'll keep you posted.
3 comments:
I'm finding this fascinating. Please keep upadting us with your thoughts and experiences as you go through your degree.
Hugs!
P
Me too, very fascinating. And coming from a family of teachers (my mum, my sister), and now with my own NGO training project, I'm quite interested in all the educational philosophy stuff. (she says sounding terribly uneducated herself.)
Loving hearing all about this El. Can't help being struck by the idea that THIS is your true calling. I think you'll be a fantastic teacher. Lucky kids.
xxx
S Ma
Post a Comment